>>22 The page you link is about the ethics of using trivial or freedom respecting js on a site. It has nothing to do with the license and has no bearing on interpretation of the license. If any modifications to the source code of a GPLv3 license program are made, the modifications need to be available. I doubt the emanon author will care about minor changes (especially if its just a .css file since thats arguably available albeit in a way that may not satisfy the GPL) but n0 should still make a best effort respect the license.
loophole regarding SaaS
even if there were (there's not), denpachan isn't using emanon as SaaS.
The page you link is about the ethics of using trivial or freedom respecting js on a site. It has nothing to do with the license and has no bearing on interpretation of the license. If any modifications to the source code of a GPLv3 license program are made, the modifications need to be available. I doubt the emanon author will care about minor changes (especially if its just a .css file since thats arguably available albeit in a way that may not satisfy the GPL) but n0 should still make a best effort respect the license.
even if there were (there's not), denpachan isn't using emanon as SaaS.