>>41
Not who you were replying to, but that is pretty much the opposite of the truth. IQ was designed to measure severely low intelligence from learning disabilities, which it is fairly good at. It's not very good at anything other than that. You can read the following for more information:
https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-largely-a-pseudoscientific-swindle-f131c101ba39

>>41
i couldn't have created a better strawman if I tried. it's so baity i would feel retarded pointing out the problems with the responses. Instead im just going to feed your "highly intelligent 122 iq" with an attention wasting bit of prose which circles around the issues, only alluding to them. because fuck you.

>>41
yes, waste attention, "distract". learn to worm the meaning out. you see, you may have high IQ, be able recognize visual patterns, and still be a total retard believing in "viruses", in "god", in "democracy", in Jesus practicing terraforming and alcohol alchemy. If you had the slighest idea about what Jesus, Buddha, Castaneda were talking about you would pay all the money in the world to have a few minutes of that sort of experience which they had had. instead you take meds and measure your iq, remaining a boring and sad retard. what iq do you need to have in order to experience infinite love?