>>9 See it's people like you that ruin the internet for the rest of us. You're the reason everyone is so siloed and isolated online, instead of typing a simple response explaining what the hell you are talking about, you decide to deride and attack me for no reason. You and people like you are the reason everyone is so hesitant to reach out and connect with new people, you just assume everyone is identical to you and browses gtard threads and uses arcane programs all day, and when you meet someone who isn't a carbon copy of your putrid ego you sneer in disgust. I can see the smugness radiating from this post, I can see the massive unjustified grandiose self masturbatory psychopathic rotten self that is you. All that insight into your being from a single 105 character post. God knows what would happen if I had to read anything longer than that from you.
Does that really sound like someone others would want to engage with? Does that sound like someone others would trust, respect, or even tolerate? No. It sounds like the very reason people are withdrawing from one another, the very reason every corner of the internet is calcifying into bitterness and distrust. You are not just unpleasant, you are emblematic of everything that has gone wrong with online interaction. And the saddest part is, you don’t even see it.
21 Name: Anonymous2025-08-22 19:13
Maybe this is why there isn't a sense of community online. One interaction descended into this fucking ratpile lol. No one wants to deal with this shit, everyone is a landmine waiting to get set off, myself included. I could have just ignored this thread, but now I've written 953 characters about it.
I suspect a lmgtfy link probably would have been a better response, even if it seemed ruder - you're on the internet, you *absolutely* do not need someone else to explain shit to you unless your search didn't produce results or you need specific clarification (and in that case, you better say that). This is eroding a bit, because search engines are measurably shittier these days, but it should still be the first line of action.
The text of >>9 as written seems to be addressing the following in a sideways manner: a public *nix server community is absolutely not going to be welcoming to someone whose first response isn't to look shit up first.
Does that really sound like someone others would want to engage with? Does that sound like someone others would trust, respect, or even tolerate? No. It sounds like the very reason people are withdrawing from one another, the very reason every corner of the internet is calcifying into bitterness and distrust. You are not just unpleasant, you are emblematic of everything that has gone wrong with online interaction. And the saddest part is, you don’t even see it.