so, all experience is subjective right? since we can only prove to ourselves that we have experiences. the concept that there is this injustice is an experience we are having, ostensibly. it can't be proven that this injustice exists except as it exists to the one experiencing it. negation of the experiencer of that injustice negates the injustice in fact. failing to negate the experience implies consent to the experience, ie there may be injustice but it is acceptable considering other aspects of the experience. does this make sense?