I think you've got your Marx a bit confused by Bourdieu's sociological managerial idiocy. Class, in Marx, has no positive content, has no "members", and has no identity. Class, existing solely as relation, is a function of the value form. In this sense, the proletariat as such is not merely the movement towards it's own abolition, that is, towards the abolition of bourgeois society and the present order.
>>10 Quite the opposite - in a social order founded upon constant production where each element must correspond to the other (Bataille terms this the general economy) rotting is the site of unfoundational externality, a practice of the active affirmation of negativity. Questions of ``competence'' that you pose are questions of the factory foreman.
>>10
Quite the opposite - in a social order founded upon constant production where each element must correspond to the other (Bataille terms this the general economy) rotting is the site of unfoundational externality, a practice of the active affirmation of negativity. Questions of ``competence'' that you pose are questions of the factory foreman.