>>11 I hate how they pride themselves with releasing their music under a "Creative Commons license", but once you take a look inside it's literally No-commercial + No-derivative, thus making it proprietary and not free culture, like they implied with "Creative Common license". Truly shows how fucked up laws play in the cards of certain people. I still can't fathom how somebody can be okay with saying "Oh, by the way, the song I made, you are legally required to only play my own version (because my version obviously is perfect) and never make a penny even if you play a cover, because this is MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY".
I hate how they pride themselves with releasing their music under a "Creative Commons license", but once you take a look inside it's literally No-commercial + No-derivative, thus making it proprietary and not free culture, like they implied with "Creative Common license". Truly shows how fucked up laws play in the cards of certain people. I still can't fathom how somebody can be okay with saying "Oh, by the way, the song I made, you are legally required to only play my own version (because my version obviously is perfect) and never make a penny even if you play a cover, because this is MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY".