>>43 who are you even talking to, no one made that claim. Whether or not Gorbachev lived in a mansion has no baring on the degree to which marxism reduces people to their labor power. >>41 No, because that was still the "human" instrumentality project. Landian accelerationism does away with humans entirely. To summarize extremely fast skipping over a lot, techno-capitalism is ultimately held back due to it's reliance on human desire, therefore it's end goal can only be to produce desire without humans aka AI. Once capital can function without humans, by producing it's own desire, it will have no need for us any longer and "nothing human makes it out of the near future". If you think that sounds unpleasant, you're a "transcendental miserabilist".
who are you even talking to, no one made that claim. Whether or not Gorbachev lived in a mansion has no baring on the degree to which marxism reduces people to their labor power.
>>41
No, because that was still the "human" instrumentality project. Landian accelerationism does away with humans entirely. To summarize extremely fast skipping over a lot, techno-capitalism is ultimately held back due to it's reliance on human desire, therefore it's end goal can only be to produce desire without humans aka AI. Once capital can function without humans, by producing it's own desire, it will have no need for us any longer and "nothing human makes it out of the near future". If you think that sounds unpleasant, you're a "transcendental miserabilist".