The ability to comprehensibly express my opinion has always been a hurdle for me. The best remedy I found was not concerning myself with the trivialities of the particular post or comment and instead focusing on the substance of what I wrote. Such a 'solution' was merely duck tape on a dam. I prithee you, Denpa's, to propose solutions to my, and to those who this problem applies as well, insolvency.

boil it down to 3rd grade level and reckon with the fact that nuance is lost. most people don't know words, you may as well speak klingon. actually it's worse than that, since they view words they don't understand as a pompous display and that means they will have a negative view of you by default and are not likely to even try to understand. You think I talk like this for fun? no, I talk like this because i want to be understood, and i find that my masturbatory desire to use "just the right word" and egocentric drive to acquire words to show superiority were standing in the way of expression. the danger of course is you will risk losing vocabulary doing this. but if you want comprehension, it's literally the only way.
Of course you can adjust your language for audience. Well i mean it's possible to, but probably not for some with >9000lvl autism.

>>2

When 17th century texts is your daily bread, then speaking in 'normal' is harder to achieve. I am pathologically attracted to the past. You could call it a type of autism. I welcome your advice and I'll apply it when I can.

Less = more.

I think modernity lacks concise and tangible hardship or dangers that can actually be overcome wich makes modern day troubles weird and hyper specific,just like modern day pet dogs have weird and quirky habits (with machines an packets), I think humans have undergone the same evolution, but with like tech and social life, N0 said it in his dream video its a shared hallucination that makes perfectly sense for everyone in it, modern day material condition and so on

>>4

The problem is universal. Throughout history there have always been those who were unable to express themselves. Unless you meant to say something else and I misunderstood you.

its true that history is full of these gems of very relatable writings, I honestly considered it, but I think them too were already too far gone lol, the social fabric is akin to a natural disaster that you cant punch your way out of and within this linguistic structure objects have changed our collective behavior in peculiar ways, what is considered a problem is so abstracted today that it pushes poeple to live up to their super ego, a bit like college class introductions lol, no one is honest in those and everyone sounds so stiff and put together, society is very much going in that direction

a funny weird thing I have noticed is how poeple bring the restrictions and limits of meat space to cyber space like they subconscious act sparing as if things in cyber space finite like in meat space without even knowing it, they optimize their builds and follow the unwritten rules of meat space

>>7
Not sure to what you refer specifically. But some meatspace limits are just as real in the wired. Bandwidth (both digital and meatbrain), cognitive load (both cpu and human, ie attention). There are real reasons to resent virtual representations which wantonly waste these resources.

I was thinking of sandboxvideogames and managementsimulation games, why replant trees or why take care of NPCs, why utilise our recourses optimally in a simulation

>>9
ah. well there's the roleplay aspect, for one. in minecraft i like to plant massive forests, because im not restricted by real world limits, destroy stick huts and replace with giant castle in the massive growing cancer forest. I have solved poverty. Everyone has a job, oh you want to be village idiot? Well i don't care, because im not a monster who is going to kill you for it (this time, that might change if i decide i want to enchant and need to get a mending book ... *ominous* )
the games also enact physical reality rules to gamified extent. same as with physics in platformers. there's no reason that gravity should pull the player down in digital spaces. ballistic motion is something they have to add in, and tweak to get it to feel "just right".
management sims punish you for utilizing virtual fake resources because it's about optimal use of resources.

i do think the game space is colored a bit too much by our physical world-centric view tho. especially in vr experiences, the drive toward reproducing the real world in vr is the shotgun wound in vr's knees.