It is more correct to muse that love is a process of mutually assured destruction, that lays less on connection, and more on seizure of this or that person, ripping them from their current social substrate and forcibly alienating them, through any means possible, from (at the very least) the familial structures that had bound them so far.
thank you for sharing your thoughts, this in particular is an outlook that i feel is GREATLY overlooked in the experience, and it would serve more to understand what they're getting into. i may be overly sentimental, but it stands to reason that it's not a coincidence for romeo and juliet to be among shakespeare's most beloved works: the struggle consisting of the families for their children against the lovers for each other results in the destruction of the familys' struggle against each other?! idfk. it's not uncommon to say that love hurts, but it's certainly not everyday i find a particularly convincing reasoning on why.
thank you for sharing your thoughts, this in particular is an outlook that i feel is GREATLY overlooked in the experience, and it would serve more to understand what they're getting into. i may be overly sentimental, but it stands to reason that it's not a coincidence for romeo and juliet to be among shakespeare's most beloved works: the struggle consisting of the families for their children against the lovers for each other results in the destruction of the familys' struggle against each other?! idfk. it's not uncommon to say that love hurts, but it's certainly not everyday i find a particularly convincing reasoning on why.