the use of ingroup/outgroup classifiers with vague/ambiguous/oft-contrary attributes is literally prehistoric. i dunno if its a game. doesnt seem like it is always. they are supposed to be tools to find people who are compatible with eachother in some form or another. shared language / darmok and jilard on the ocean type shit. if denpa isnt useful congrats you are a normie. but since you are here it probably is useful. but it isnt an archetype. you might be able to find some qualities that help shape the classifier, (there are several fruitless threads here attempting to do that very thing) but the term doesnt care and performs its function regardless.
the use of ingroup/outgroup classifiers with vague/ambiguous/oft-contrary attributes is literally prehistoric. i dunno if its a game. doesnt seem like it is always. they are supposed to be tools to find people who are compatible with eachother in some form or another. shared language / darmok and jilard on the ocean type shit.
if denpa isnt useful congrats you are a normie. but since you are here it probably is useful. but it isnt an archetype. you might be able to find some qualities that help shape the classifier, (there are several fruitless threads here attempting to do that very thing) but the term doesnt care and performs its function regardless.