>>3 i’m honestly not sure i get your point at all. it sounds like you’re stacking a classic solipsism argument on top of a rhetorical jump to “therefore you should stop existing,” and that leap just doesn’t follow for me.
i’m not trying to lob shit at the fan, i saw it as a chance to yak about subjective meanin and why people keep trudging on even when nothing’s provable. if you wanna keep it there, no edgy ultimatums, i’m game.
>>7 2020’s demiurge called - they want their new biofuel to feed entropy with a meat calling back. come on, bring actual arguments instead of your muh white race reddit-tier bullshit. climate change isn’t gonna pause for your tantrums and there’s no universal incoming or heaven‑level communism like it’s a solution and you act like a nazi
those insta‑mom accounts need to be re‑educated by being put in zindân - literally 90s‑style mom energy, a cruelty show disguised as a circus, but really, for whom?
>>3 >>10 What doesn't seem to follow - at least for me - is that you stated that OP is wrong simply because he hasn't followed through with the logical solution to life (which is suicide). That, in itself, does not invalidate his point. You could maybe call him a hypocrite (even though I wouldn't consider Op to be one), but you couldn't say that he is wrong.
There doesn't seem to be a connection between "since you didn't just stop reading and kill yourself having realized that" leading to "that means you are wrong". It could be, for example, that the act of killing yourself is not capable of healing the damage caused by being alive.
>>11 Do you even know what denpa means? You clearly do not belong here, please leave.
>>3 The harm has already been caused. OP was already born. OP is already here on the planet and now, due to his/her biological wiring, possesses a strong sense of antipathy towards death. Given that the foundational driving force of anti-natalist rhetoric is harm reduction, in the vast majority of cases suicide is not advisable as it will increase harm / pain towards the person committing it and, more importantly, those in the persons life that must deal with the fallout. There is an aphorism by Emil Cioran that, while admittedly being quite edgy, gets to the point of the matter; "It is not worth the bother of killing yourself, since you always kill yourself too late."
i’m honestly not sure i get your point at all. it sounds like you’re stacking a classic solipsism argument on top of a rhetorical jump to “therefore you should stop existing,” and that leap just doesn’t follow for me.
i’m not trying to lob shit at the fan, i saw it as a chance to yak about subjective meanin and why people keep trudging on even when nothing’s provable. if you wanna keep it there, no edgy ultimatums, i’m game.
>>7
2020’s demiurge called - they want their new biofuel to feed entropy with a meat calling back. come on, bring actual arguments instead of your muh white race reddit-tier bullshit. climate change isn’t gonna pause for your tantrums and there’s no universal incoming or heaven‑level communism like it’s a solution and you act like a nazi
those insta‑mom accounts need to be re‑educated by being put in zindân - literally 90s‑style mom energy, a cruelty show disguised as a circus, but really, for whom?