>>3 yeah it remains entirely fucked up that browsers don't interpret feeds at all the fact that Firefox doesn't even say "hey, Firefox doesn't open these anymore, but you can use our sister program, Thunderbird" is some actual bull-fucking-shit, let alone the fact that Chrome has never handled feed links in any capacity
so if it's just gonna be shown as raw XML to the reader, I can at least tell them what they're supposed to do with this
yeah
it remains entirely fucked up that browsers don't interpret feeds at all
the fact that Firefox doesn't even say "hey, Firefox doesn't open these anymore, but you can use our sister program, Thunderbird" is some actual bull-fucking-shit, let alone the fact that Chrome has never handled feed links in any capacity
so if it's just gonna be shown as raw XML to the reader, I can at least tell them what they're supposed to do with this