2025 02 26 13:19 & 2025 02 26 17:13 reply: I summarize the main points near the end of the Lacan pieces but you will not get any of the reasoning sources or demonstrations from that. Also nihilism hear means life/world denial or resignation in the Nietzschean sense to clarify (sorry if my essay is too optimistic for this community, I stopped hating myself like 2 weeks ago lol):
"What have we learned now? That images are fields of potential, autonomy, and freedom in their own right. That the laws of nihilism have subordinated language and ourselves too long in reaction, and it is time to liberate and resist against them in the name of higher active modes of becoming. And finally, that we and the world are always a many; and this many is a triumph, an affirmation and glory that will realize worlds never before seen."
Also for the third essay I critique Zizek's oneness a reinscribing privation into ontology by the evoking the one and the Deleuzean ontology which replaces privation which creative nonsense of intensive quantities (pre-intelligible quantities or distances of more or less without how much) which I think is superior for emancipatory politics.
Also to clarify the laws of nihilism is the perspective of denying the affirmation of the naming or metaphors of active evaluators and metaphorizing them from the reactive perspective as "evil" and then metonymically spreading this evaluation either downward or upward from whole to parts or part to whole until all reality collapses into nothingness or the process is disrupted.
I summarize the main points near the end of the Lacan pieces but you will not get any of the reasoning sources or demonstrations from that. Also nihilism hear means life/world denial or resignation in the Nietzschean sense to clarify (sorry if my essay is too optimistic for this community, I stopped hating myself like 2 weeks ago lol):
"What have we learned now? That images are fields of potential, autonomy, and freedom in their own right. That the laws of nihilism have subordinated language and ourselves too long in reaction, and it is time to liberate and resist against them in the name of higher active modes of becoming. And finally, that we and the world are always a many; and this many is a triumph, an affirmation and glory that will realize worlds never before seen."
Also for the third essay I critique Zizek's oneness a reinscribing privation into ontology by the evoking the one and the Deleuzean ontology which replaces privation which creative nonsense of intensive quantities (pre-intelligible quantities or distances of more or less without how much) which I think is superior for emancipatory politics.
Also to clarify the laws of nihilism is the perspective of denying the affirmation of the naming or metaphors of active evaluators and metaphorizing them from the reactive perspective as "evil" and then metonymically spreading this evaluation either downward or upward from whole to parts or part to whole until all reality collapses into nothingness or the process is disrupted.