Return Entire thread Last 50 posts
Pages: 1-100 101-200 201-300 301-400 401-500 501-600 601-700 701-800 801-900 901-1000

CHAT THREAD ITT

93 Name: Anonymous 2025-07-11 01:11
>>92
Human beings are capable of choosing. Perhaps we can not always choose what we desire but we can choose whether or not to indulge in it. Thereby, potentially making ourselves desire it further. Or less, depending on the circumstances. The idea that "you are your environment" is not as direct of a rebuke of agency as you may think. While genetics and shared environment account for some variation in traits, the non-shared environment, which includes unpredictable and unique experiences, plays a significant role in shaping individual differences. I see this non-shared environment, encompassing random events and unique experiences, as the space where individuals build their selves and make choices, even within the constraints of their biology and upbringing.
94 Name: Anonymous 2025-07-11 01:23
>>92
To what extent is it objectification or merely an expression of personal preference? I fail to understand the distinction. Is a gay man "objectifying" men if they have a preference for men? Is a straight woman "objectifying" men by having a preference for men? There are terms used in scientific research to define people with a preference with transgender people. One of the terms is "trans-attracted", another would be "trans-amorous". There is nothing wrong with people having these preferences as long as they do not engage in toxic or insensitive behavior. The preference itself is not inherently a form of objectification. You getting mad at someone expressing their preference is but another form of prejudice, akin to disgust expressed at a gay person simply for being gay.
95 Name: Anonymous 2025-07-11 01:27
>>92
>>93
foucault vs chomsky, 197

Return Entire thread Last 50 posts 1-100
This thread has reached the post limit. You can't reply anymore.